
Bill Pryor is an outstanding judicial nominee because he has
a proven record of following the law and standing up for the civil rights of
African Americans even when it costs him politically. Recently, several civil rights
leaders charged that Bill opposed the Voting
Rights Act. In reality, Bill only questioned the usefulness of section 5 of
the Voting Rights Act that requires
the Justice Department to “pre clear” – approve—even minor changes in voting
practices that have nothing to do with discrimination, like using stickers to
attach the name of a replacement for a deceased candidate on a ballot after the
ballot forms were printed. Bill’s position that the section 5 procedure is too burdensome is the same position taken by Thurbert Baker, the African American Democrat Attorney
General of
When it comes to section 2 of the Voting Rights Act and other provisions that do impact minority voting rights, Bill has taken the side of the NAACP to stop white Alabama Republicans from challenging old voting districts and has taken the side of African American legislators to oppose a redistricting plan that white Republicans supported.
Some have also questioned Pryor’s position in the Alexander
v. Sandoval case. The case dealt with whether Congress had authorized a
private lawsuit by a person who didn’t speak English to force the State of
When it comes to civil rights issues, from working with African
American leaders to repeal
Greg Griffin is a
free lance writer. You can read his previous articles by logging on to his web
page at www.greggriffin.com